Charles Sturt University
Charles Sturt University

Professor Jane Goodman-Delahunty

Professor Jane Goodman-Delahunty

BA (Witwatersrand), TTHD (Witwatersrand), JD (Seattle U School of Law), PhD (Washington)

Profile

Jane Goodman-Delahunty is an experimental psychologist and lawyer. Her empirical legal studies foster evidence-based decisions to promote social, procedural and distributive justice within organisations and the community. She practiced at the Bar in the State of Washington (1983-1992), was an Administrative Judge for the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Southern California (1992-2001) and third-party neutral with JAMS The Resolution Experts (1994-2001).

She is a Member of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) on the Community Services and Equal Opportunity Divisions and a Member of the Criminal Justice Working Group of the Royal Commission into Responses to Institutional Child Sexual Abuse. 

Jane was a Visiting Professor at the China University of Political Science and Law in Beijing (2014), a Leverhulme Trust Foundation Visiting Professor at the University of Surrey (2013), and Visiting Professor at Ritsumeikan University Psychology-Law Program in Kyoto, Japan (2012). Jane is a past President of the Australia & New Zealand Association of Psychiatry Psychology & Law and of the  American Psychology Law Society.  She was Editor of Psychology, Public Policy and Law (2001-2006). She was a part-time Commissioner at the NSW Law Reform Commission for 10 years and a Mediator for the NSW Office of Fair Trading Mediation Services Unit. Previously, she directed the Postgraduate Program in Forensic Psychology at the University of New South Wales.

Top of page


Awards

  • 2007 Book Prize, Evaluating sexual harassment: Psychological, social, and legal considerations in forensic assessments (2005), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, co-authored by William E Foote. Awarded by the American Psychology-Law Society.

Top of page


Funded Research

exceeding $6.5 million.

Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

2016-2017   Memory and the law in cases of child sexual abuse..

2015-2016   Joinder of trials with multiple victims: Jury deliberations and decisions.

2014-2016   Evaluation of alternative procedures for complainants' evidence.

     

Australian Research Council Discovery and Linkage Projects

2017-2019  Interpreting justice: mode, accuracy and credibility in court interpreting.

2016-2020   Threshold decisions in determining whether to prosecute child sexual abuse.

2012-2016   Rape victims on trial: Police officers' and jurors' beliefs about sexual assault.

2011-2015   Interpreters in court: Witness credibility in interpreted testimony, $297K

2011-2015   Countering jury misconceptions in child sexual assault cases, $285K

2010-2015   Juror confidence in justice: Democratic participation or deference to authority.

2010-2015   Australian jurors' perspectives on expert evidence.

2010-2015   The presentation of expert evidence: The role of lawyers and experts.

2008-2010   Gateways to justice: Video-mediated communications in justice settings.

2006-2009   Juries and interactive visual evidence: Deliberation processes and outcomes.

 

United States High Value Detainee Interrogation Group

2016-2018   Remote interpreting in investigative interviews.

2013-2015   Situational and relational effects on interpreting in high stakes interviews.

2012-2015   Interview techniques to secure cooperation by high value detainees.

2012-2015   An international experimental survey of interviewing practices and beliefs.

2012-2015   Intelligence and counter-intelligence interviewing in the Asia Pacific.

 

Korean Institute of Criminology

2011-2012   Strengthening forensic science in Korea.

     

Australian Criminology Research Advisory Council

2011-2015   Re-offense risk in parental child sex offenders.

2008-2009   Improving expert communication about DNA profiling evidence.

2006-2008   Practices, policies and procedures that enhance jury satisfaction.

     

National Science Foundation Law and Social Science Division and Global Initiatives

1991-1993   Cross‑racial eyewitness identification and multicultural change.

1988-1990   Jurors' causal reasoning in civil cases.

1986-1988   Comprehension of statistical assessment in civil litigation.

National Institute of Dispute Resolution

1989-1990   Lawyer overconfidence as a barrier to settlement.

American Bar Association and American Bar Foundation

1985-1989   Jury competence in complex cases.

1990-1991  The psychology of mediation in the legal process.

National Institute of Justice

1985-1986   Jury comprehension of scientific evidence.

New South Wales Government Funding

2011-2014NSW Juvenile Justice,Low-risk juvenile offenders who reoffend and high-risk offenders who desist.

2011-2014Community Legal Service Centres NSW, Advocates' experiences with the NSW Police Force complaints system.

2010-2012 NSW Police Force Customer Service Program: Evaluation and analysis.

2008 NSW Health, Evaluation of NSW Pre-Trial Diversion Program for Incest Offenders.

2001-2004 NSW Police Force Inherent requirements of frontline policing.

Spokane County Public Defender, Washington State

1990-1991Impact of violent videotaped evidence on jurors in death penalty cases.

University Funding Programs

2012 Young peoples' experiences with police, Charles Sturt University

2011 Visiting Professorship, Professor M.K. Dhami, Charles Sturt University.

2010 Visiting Professorship, Professor Siegfried Sporer, Charles Sturt University.

2008 Countering misconceptions in child sex assault cases, UNSW Australia.

2006 Multimedia and jury understanding of DNA evidence, UNSW Australia.

2006 Gender equity in the Science Faculty: A study of two schools, UNSW Australia.

2005 Gender stereotyping and networking in promotions, UNSW Australia.

2002 Consequences of workplace injuries, UNSW Australia.

1983 Probabilistic scientific evidence, University of Washington.

Global Initiative for Academic Networks (pending)

2017  Visiting Professorship, NALSAR University of Law.

Leverhulme Trust Foundation, United Kingdom

2013 Leverhulme Trust Foundation Visiting Professorship.

China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China

2014 Psychology of Criminal Justice Summer Program Visiting Professorship.


Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan

2012 International Advanced Studies Program Visiting Professorship.

Top of page


Publications

Books:

  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Nolan, M, & van Gijn-Grosvenor, E. (2017, in press).  Empirical Guidance on How Childhood Sexual Abuse Affects Memory and its Impact on Complainants' Evidence. Sydney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Das, D.K. (Eds.). (2017). Trends in legal advocacy: Interviews with prosecutors and criminal defence lawyers across the globe.  Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press
  • Tait, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (Eds.). (2017). Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror.  London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Powell, M., Westera, N., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Pichler, A. (2016).  An evaluation of how evidence is elicited from complainants of child sexual abuse. Sydney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & Martschuk, N. (2016).  Jury reasoning in separate and joint trials of institutional child sexual abuse: An empirical study.  Sydney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
  • Freckelton, I., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Horan, J., & McKimmie, B. (2016).  Expert evidence and criminal jury trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nolan, M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015).  Legal psychology in Australia.  Pyrmont: Thomson-Reuters.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & O'Brien, K. (2014).  Reoffence risk in intrafamilial child sex offenders.http://www.criminologyresearchcouncil.gov.au/reports/201314.html#1011-44 Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology Technical and Background Paper Series.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Saunders, P. E., Tinsley, Y., & Dhami, M. K. (2012).  Strengthening forensic science in Korea.  Seoul: Korean Institute of Criminology.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Foote, W. E.  (2011). Evaluation for workplace discrimination and harassment.  Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DNA - https://www.dropbox.com/s/piiedrwz3lqicfs/DNA_2008.mp4?dl=0 RMP - https://www.dropbox.com/s/8kb4je9ia71eujn/RMP_2008.mp4?dl=0
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Hewson, L.  (2010). Improving jury understanding and use of DNA evidence. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology Technical and Background Paper Series. 
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Brewer, N., Clough, J., Horan, J., Ogloff, J. R. P., Tait, D., & Pratley, J. (2008).  Practices, policies and procedures that influence juror satisfaction in Australia.  Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series 87.
  • Ogloff, J. R. P., Clough, J. & Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Young, W. (2006).  The jury project: Stage 1 – A survey of Australian and New Zealand judges.  Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.
  • Foote, W. E., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2005).  Evaluating sexual harassment: Psychological, social, and legal considerations in forensic evaluations.  Washington, DC:  American Psychological Association.[1]
  • Goodman, J., Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F.  (1989). Jury comprehension in complex cases.   Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Litigation Section.
  • Goodman, J. (1986). Probabilistic scientific evidence: Jurors' inferences.  Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.

Book chapters:

  • Hale, S., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Martschuk, N. (2017, in press).  Interactional management in a simulated police interview: Interpreters' strategies. In M. Mason & F.  Rock, The discourse of police investigation.  Chicago, Illinois: Chicago University Press.
  • Nolan, M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017, in press).  Law and psychology in Australia.  In M. Inaba, T. Sato, K. Matsumoto, H. Shinoda, & K. Wakabayashi (Eds.), World trends in law and psychology.  Tokyo: Shin-yo sha.
  • Cossins, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017).  The application of the Uniform Evidence Law to delay in child sexual assault trials.  In A. Roberts & J. Gans (Eds.) Critical perspectives on the Uniform Evidence Law (pp. 104-124).  Sydney: Federation Press.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Taitz, M., Sowemimo, C. & Nguyen, I. (2017). Using complaints against the police to improve community-police relations.  In J.A. Eterno, M.A. Das, D.K. Das & A Verma (Eds.), Global issues in contemporary policing (pp. 97-120).  Boca Raton: CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.crcpress.com/Global-Issues-in-Contemporary-Policing/Eterno-Das-Das-Verma/p/book/9781482248524
  • Horan, J., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017).  The legal landscape in terrorism trials.  In D. Tait & J. Goodman-Delahunty (Eds.), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror (pp. 11-35).London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017).  Assessing unfair prejudice from extremist images in terrorism trials.  In D. Tait & J. Goodman-Delahunty (Eds.), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror (pp. 87-121).  London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Tait, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017).  Images of interactive virtual environments: Do they affect verdicts? In D. Tait & J. Goodman-Delahunty (Eds.), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror (pp. 173-191).  London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Tait, D., (2017).  CSI effects on jury reasoning and verdicts. In D. Tait & J. Goodman-Delahunty (Eds.), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror (pp. 217-233).  London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Tait, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017).  The effect of deliberation on jury verdicts. In D. Tait & J. Goodman-Delahunty (Eds.), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror (pp. 235-248). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Tait, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017).  Conclusions.  In D. Tait & J. Goodman-Delahunty (Eds.), Juries, science and popular culture in the age of terror (pp. 273-285).  London: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Das, D. K. (2017). Legal advocacy around the globe. I n J. Goodman-Delahunty & D.K. Das (Eds.), Trends in legal advocacy: Interviews with prosecutors and criminal defence lawyers across the globe (pp. 1-6).  Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Das, D. K. (2017). Conclusion: Bridging the gap between legal practice and evidence-based justice.  In J. Goodman-Delahunty & D.K. Das (Eds.), Trends in legal advocacy: Interviews with prosecutors and criminal defence lawyers across the globe (pp. 309-315).  Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2016).  Insights on investigative interviewing from practitioners and suspects in Indonesia, the Philippines and Sri Lanka. In D. Walsh, G.E. Oxburgh, A.D. Redlich, & T. Myklebust (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Volume II Suspects (pp. 18-33). Abingdon, UK: Routledge Press.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015).  The Honourable James R. Wood AO QC: New South Wales Supreme Court Judge. In D. Lowe & D.K. Das (Eds.), Trends in the judiciary: Interviews with judges across the globe, Vol. Two, (pp. 57-76).  New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Nguyen, I. (2015). Australia: The Australian Criminal Justice System.  In D. Lowe & D.K. Das (Eds.), Trends in the judiciary: Interviews with judges across the globe, Vol. Two (pp. 37-41).  New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Goodman-Delahunty J., & Foote W. E. (2013). Evaluation for harassment and discrimination claims.  In R. Roesch & P.A. Zapf (Eds.), Forensic assessments in criminal and civil law: A handbook for lawyers (pp. 175-190).  New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Rossner, M., & Tait, D. (2011).  Simulation and dissimulation in jury research: Credibility in a live mock trial.  In L. Bartels & K. Richardson (eds.), Qualitative criminology: stories from the field (pp. 30-40).  Sydney: Federation Press.
  • Fishman, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010)Pragmatic psychology.  In J. Brown & E. Campbell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of forensic psychology, (pp. 95-101).  UK:Cambridge University Press.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Walker, B. (2010).  Academic life: An interpersonal dimension.  In R. Cantwell & J. Scevak (Eds.), An academic life: A handbook for new academics (pp. 160-172).Sydney:Acer Press.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Tait, D. (2006).  Lay participation in legal decision making in Australia and New Zealand: Jury trials and administrative tribunals.  In M. F. Kaplan & A. M. Martin Rodriguez (Eds.), Understanding world juries through psychological research (pp. 47-7).  NY: Psychology Press.
  • Devaraj, S. & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2009). Dialect and credibility judgements of indigenous Australian suspects.  In A. Mahboob & C. Lipovsky (Eds.), Studies in applied linguistics and language learning (pp. 74-85).  Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Sporer, S. L., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2009).  Disparities in judicial determinations in sentencing.  In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck & J. Hupfeld-Hienemann (Eds.), The social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 379-401). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., ForsterLee, L., & ForsterLee, R. (2005).  Dealing with the guilty offender: Psychological aspects of sentencing decisions in research, practice and policy.  In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 445-482).  New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Malpass, R. S., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2004).  Psychology and the law, Overview.  In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, 3, (pp. 171-184).  Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1999).  Civil law: Employment and discrimination.  In R. Roesch, S. D. Hart & James E. Ogloff (Eds.), Perspectives on psychology and law: The state of the discipline, (pp. 277‑336).  New York: Plenum Press.
  • Goodman, J., Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1994).  Runaway verdicts or reasoned determinations: Mock‑juror strategies in awarding damages.  In R. M. Krivoshey (Ed.), Readings in trial advocacy and the social sciences, Vol. 4: Instructions, verdicts and judicial behaviour (pp. 187-212). New York: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
  • Raitz, A., Greene, E., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1994).  Determining damages: The influence of expert testimony on juror's decision-making.  In R. M. Krivoshey (Ed.), Readings in trial advocacy and the social sciences, Vol. 4: Instructions, verdicts and judicial (pp. 231-241). New York: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
  • Christianson, S. A., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1992).  Eyewitness memory for stressful events: Methodological quandaries and ethical dilemmas.  In S. A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory.  NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1991).  Judgment and memory: The role of expert testimony on eyewitness accuracy.  In P. Tetlock and P. Suedfeld (Eds.), Psychology and social policy, (pp. 267‑282).  Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
  • Goodman, J., de Ryss, D., & Sebree, C. (1990).  Employment discrimination.  In Washington Lawyers Practice Manual.  Seattle, WA: Seattle‑King County Bar Association Young Lawyers Division.
  • Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1989).  Implications of facial memory research for investigative and adjudicative criminal processes.  In A. W. Young and H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing, (pp. 571‑579).  Amsterdam: North Holland Publ. Co.
  • Loftus, E. F., & Goodman, J. (l984).  Techniques for direct and cross‑examination of witnesses. In S. Kassin & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and courtroom procedure (pp.201‑228). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Refereed journal articles:

  • Martschuk, N., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Powell, M., & Westera, N. (2017, under review).  Grooming similarities in institutional and non-institutional child sexual abuse cases: A systematic comparison.  Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.
  • Sivasubramaniam D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017, under review).  Interrogators' evaluations of procedural justice: What drives support for coercive procedures. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
  • Brubacher, S., Powell, M., Westera, N., & Goodman-Delahunty, J(2017, under review).  Approaches by Australian judges to determining children's competence: A time for reform.  Criminal Law Journal.
  • Westera, N., Powell, M., Zydervelt, S., Pichler, A., Leach, C., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2017, under review).   Lawyers' strategies for cross-examining complainants of child sexual abuse.  Psychology, Public Policy and Law.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Palmer, S. (2017, under review).  Electronic monitors in domestic violence cases: An evidence-based appraisal of uses in Australia and the United States of America. International Journal for Court Administration. Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Martschuk, N. (2017, in press).  Securing reliable information in investigative interviews: Coercive and noncoercive strategies preceding turning points. Police Practice and Research: Special Issue on Police Leadership and Wrongful Conviction.
  •  Blatch, C., O'Sullivan, K., Willis, M., Delaney, J.J., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (in press, accepted 30/11/2015), Effectiveness of the CSNSW Domestic Abuse Program for indigenous offenders.  Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Howes, L. M. (2017).  High-stakes interviews and rapport development: Practitioners' perceptions of interpreter impact.  Policing and Society. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1293051
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Cossins, A. (2017).  What Australian jurors know and do not know about evidence in child sexual abuse cases.  Criminal Law Journal, 41, 86-103.
  • Dhami, M.K., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Desai, S. (2017).  Development of an information sheet providing rapport advice for interpreters in police interviews.  Police Practice and Research: An International Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2017.1291580
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Cossins, A. (2017).  Validation of the Child Sexual Abuse Knowledge Questionnaire.  Psychology, Crime and Law. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1258469
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Martschuk, N. (2016).  Risks and benefits of interpreter-mediated interviews.  Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 18(4), 451-470.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Schuller, R., & Martschuk, N. (2016). Workplace sexual harassment in policing: Perceived psychological injuries by source and severity. Psychological Injury & Law, 9(3), 241–252.doi:10.1007/s12207-016-9265-3
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & Martschuk, N. (2016). National jury research published.  Judicial Officers' Bulletin, 28(5), 45-48.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Cossins, A. (2016).  Programmatic pretest-posttest research to reduce jury bias in child sexual abuse cases. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 6(2), 283-214.
  • Doyle, S., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2016). The coronial investigation of suspected deaths: Prevalence and outcomes in NSW.  Journal of Law and Medicine, 23(3), 609-627.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Howes, L.M. (2016).  Social persuasion to develop rapport in high stakes interviews: A qualitative analysis of Asian-Pacific policing practices. Policing & Society: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 26(3), 270-290. 
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Corbo Crehan, A. (2016).  Enhancing police responses to domestic violence incidents: Reports from client advocates in New South Wales.  Violence Against Women, 22(8), 1007-1026. doi:077801215613854
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Ockenden, E. (2016).  Effects of terrorist charges and threatening conduct on mock-juror decisions.  Psychiatry, Psychology, and the Law, 23(5), 696-708.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015). The jury box and the urn: Containing our expectations. Pandora's Box: Crime, Justice and the People, 9-16.
  • Howes L.M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015). Teachers' career decisions: Perspectives on choosing teaching careers, and on staying or leaving. Issues in Educational Research, 25(1), 18-35.
  • Howes, L.M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2015). Career decisions by Australian police officers: A cross-section of perspectives on entering, staying in and leaving policing careers.  Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 16(6), 453-468.
  • Essex, R., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014).  Jury understanding of beyond reasonable doubt.  Journal of Judicial Administration, 24, 1-30.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Dhami, M.K. (2014). Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures.  Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 883-897. doi: 10.1002/acp.3087
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Beckley, A., & Martin, M. (2014). Resolving or escalating disputes?  Experiences of the NSW Police Force complaints process.  Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, 25(2), 79-90.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & O'Brien, K. (2014).  Parental sexual offending: Managing risk through diversion. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 482, 1-9.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014).  Profiling parental child sex abuse.  Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 465, 1-8.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Gumbert, T., & Hale, S. (2014).  The biasing influence of linguistic variations in DNA profiling evidence.  Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences,46(1),1-13.
  • Abrahamson, D.E., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014).  Impediments to information and knowledge sharing within policing: A study of three Canadian policing organizations.  SAGE Open, Vol 4(1), doi: 10.1177/2158244013519363
  • Dhami, M.K., Belton, I., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014).  Quasirationality: The only way to perform a cognitive balancing act when sentencing?  Journal of Applied Memory and Cognition, 4(3).  doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.009
  • Howes, L. M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014). Predicting career stability and mobility: Embeddedness and boundarylessness. Journal of Career Development,42(3), 244-259.  doi: 10.1177/0894845314548722
  • Howes, L. M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014).  Life course research design: Exploring career change experiences of former school teachers and police officers. Journal of Career Development, 41(1), 62-84. doi: 10.1177/0894845312474370
  • Rossner, M., Tait, D. & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014). Students vs. jurors: Responding to enhanced video technology. Laws, Special issue on Technology, Social Media and Law, 3(3), 618-635. doi:10.3390/laws3030618 http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/3/3/618
  • Sivasubramaniam, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014).  Cultural variation in Australia: ethnicity, host community residence, and power-distance values.  Cross-Cultural Communication, 10(4), 136-144. DOI: 10.3968/4810
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Sowemimo-Coker, C.R., & Kingsford, J. (2013).  The centrality of procedural justice in citizen complaints about police. The Journal of the Institute of Justice & International Studies, 13, 83-98.
  • Abrahamson, D. E., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013).  The impact of organizational information culture on information use outcomes in policing: an exploratory study.  Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 18(4).
  • Howes, L. M., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013). A policing career: What drives a person to join, stay in, or leave policing?  Australian Policing Journal, 67(4), 168-191.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., O'Brien, K., & Gumbert-Jourjon, T. (2013).  Police professionalism in suspect interviews: Cross-cultural endorsement of procedural justice.  The Journal of the Institute of Justice & International Studies, 13, 65-82.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Taitz, M., & Verbrugge, H. (2013). Complaining to the police: Insights from a psychological analysis.  Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 7(3), 280-288.
  • Harmer, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013).  Practitioners' opinions of best interests of the child in Australian legislation.  Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(2), 251-271. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2013.808977
  • Howes, L., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013).  Life course research design: Exploring career change experiences of former Australian school teachers and police officers.  Journal of Career Development, 41(1), 62-84. doi: 10.1177/0894845312474370.
  • Bradford, D., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Brooks, K.  (2013). The impact of presentation modality on perceptions of truthful and deceptive confessions. Journal of Criminology, Article ID 164546, doi:10.1155/2013/164546.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Foote, W. (2013).  Using a five-stage model to evaluate workplace psychological injuries. Journal of Psychological Injury, 6(2), 92-99.
  • Swan, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013). The relationship between drug use and crime among police detainees: Does gender matter?  International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12, 1-9.
  • Cossins, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013).  Misconceptions or expert evidence in child sexual assault trials: Enhancing justice and jurors' 'common sense'. Journal of Judicial Administration, 22,171-190.
  • Ede, T., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013).  Question trails in trials: Structured versus unstructured juror decision making.  Criminal Law Journal, 37,114-136.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Dhami, M. (2013).  A forensic examination of court reports.  Australian Psychologist, 48, 32-40.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Wakabayashi, K. (2012). Adversarial forensic science experts: An empirical study of jury deliberation, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24(1), 85-103.
  • Titcomb, C., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Waubert de Puiseau, B. W. (2012).  Pretrial diversion for intrafamilial child sexual offending: Does biological paternity matter?" Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39,552-570.
  • Butler, L., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Lulham, R. (2012).  The effectiveness of pretrial community-based diversion in reducing reoffending by adult intra-familial child sex offenders.  Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 493-513.
  • Pratley, J., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2011). Increased self-disclosure of offending by intrafamilial child sex offenders. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 44-52.
  • Verbrugge, H., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Frize, M. (2011). Risk assessment in intellectually disabled offenders: Validation of the suggested ID supplement to the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 83-91.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & O'Brien, K. (2011). A comparison of expert evidence and judicial directions to counter misconceptions in child sexual abuse trials. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 196-217.
  • Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2011).  Mock juror decision making in a civil negligence trial: The impact of gruesome evidence, injury severity and information processing route.  Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 18, 439- 459.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Graham, K. (2011).  The influence of victim intoxication and victim attire on police responses to sexual assault. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(1), 22-40.
  • Rowden, E., Wallace, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010). Sentencing by videolink in Australia: Up in the Air. Criminal Law Journal, 34, 1-22.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Verbrugge, H. (2010).  Reality, fantasy and the truth about CSI effects.  InPsych, the Bulletin of the Australian Psychological Society, 18-19.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., (2010).  Four ingredients: New recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing.  Policing: A Journal of Policing and Practice, 4, 403-410.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & O'Brien, K.  (2010). Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: The effect of expert evidence and judicial directions on.  Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 28, 769-783.
  • Horan, J., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010). Challenging the peremptory challenge system in Australia.  Criminal Law Journal, 34,167-186.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Granhag, P. A., Hartwig, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2010).  Insightful or wishful: lawyers' ability to predict case outcomes.  Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 133-157. DNA - https://www.dropbox.com/s/piiedrwz3lqicfs/DNA_2008.mp4?dl=0 RMP - https://www.dropbox.com/s/8kb4je9ia71eujn/RMP_2008.mp4?dl=0
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Hewson, L. (2010).  Improving jury understanding and use of DNA evidence. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 392, 1-6.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2010).  Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: A research review of psychological sources of disparity.  Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(1), 9-36.
  • Cossins, A., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & O'Brien, K. (2009).  Uncertainty and misconceptions about child sexual abuse: Implications for the criminal justice system.  Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 16, 435-452.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Foote, W. E. (2009).  Forensic evaluations advance scientific theory: Assessing causation of harm.  In special issue on Case-based Theory Building.  Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5, 38-52.
  • Sivasubramaniam, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2008). Ethnicity and trust: Perceptions of police bias. Policing: International Journal of Police Science and Management, 10, 388-401.
  • McLean, R., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2008).  The influence of relationship and physical evidence on police decision-making in sexual assault cases.  Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 40, 109-121.
  • Bradford, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2008).  Detecting deception in police investigations: Implications for false confessions.  Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15, 105-118.
  • Sivasubramaniam, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2008). Effects of convenor identity and power-distance on decisions to participate in restorative justice conferences. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15, 301-316.
  • Hewson, L., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2008).  Using multimedia to support jury understanding of DNA profiling evidence. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 40, 55-64.
  • O'Brien, K., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Clough, J., & Pratley, J. (2008).  Juror satisfaction and confidence in New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia.  Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. 354, 1-6.
  • Betts, S., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2007).  The case of Kathleen Folbigg: How did justice and medicine fare?  Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 11-24.
  • Saunders, P., Huynh, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2007).  Defining workplace bullying behaviour: Professional and lay definitions of workplace bullying.  International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 340-354.
  • Ogloff, J. R. P., Clough, J., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Young, W.  (2007). Enhancing communication with Australian and New Zealand juries: A survey of judges.  Journal of Judicial Administration, 17. 1-20.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2007). "Secrets of the jury room," by Malcolm Knox. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 127.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Tait, D. (2006).  DNA and the changing face of justice.  Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38, 97-106.
  • Dartnall, S., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006).  Enhancing juror understanding of probabilistic DNA evidence.  Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38, 86-96.
  • Sivasubramaniam, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006).  Trust and power-distance: A psychological perspective on fairness in restorative justice conferences.  Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 13, 203-219.
  • Cush, R. K., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006).  The influence of judicial instructions on processing and judgments of emotionally evocative evidence.  Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 13, 110-123
  • Bright, D. A. & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006).  Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame and jury decision making.  Law and Human Behavior, 30, 183-202.
  • Bright, D. A. & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2004).  The influence of verbal gruesome evidence on mock juror verdicts.  Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 154-166.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Newell, B. (2004). One in how many trillion?  Australasian Scientist, 25, 14-17.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J.  (2001). Exemplary exemplar-based instruction. Review of S. L. Brodsky, "The expert expert witness: More maxims and guidelines for testifying in court," Contemporary Psychology, 46,209-210.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (2000).  Psychological impairment under the Americans with Disabilities Act: Legal guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 197-205.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (2000).  Employment discrimination.  In A. E. Kadzin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology.  Washington, D.C., Oxford Univ. Press and American Psychological Association.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1999).  Pragmatic considerations supporting the reasonable victim standard in hostile workplace sexual harassment cases.  In R. L. Wiener & B. A. Gutek, (Eds.), Advances in sexual harassment research, theory, and policy, Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 5, 519-555.
  • Greene, E., Downey, C., & Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1999).  Juror decisions about damages in employment discrimination cases.  Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 107‑121.
  • Foote, W. E., & Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1999).  Same‑sex harassment: Implications of the Oncale decision for forensic evaluations of plaintiffs.  Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 123‑139.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J., Greene, E., & Hsiao, W.  (1998). Construing motive in videotaped killings: The role of jurors' attitudes toward the death penalty.  Law & Human Behavior, 22, 257‑271.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1998).  Approaches to gender and the law: Research and applications.  In P. E. Frazier and J. E. Hunt (Eds.), Special Issue on Gender and the Law, Law & Human Behavior, 22, 129‑143.
  • Bersoff, D., Goodman‑Delahunty, J., Grisso, T., Hans, V., Poythress, N., & Roesch, R.  (1997). Training in law and psychology: Models from the Villanova conference.  American Psychologist, 52, 1301‑1310.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1997).  Forensic psychological expertise in the wake of DaubertLaw and Human Behavior, 21,121‑140.
  • Greene, E., & Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1995).  Diagnosis of psychological impairment in employment discrimination claims.  Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13, 459‑476.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J., & Foote, W. (1995).  Compensation for pain, suffering and other psychological injuries: The impact of Daubert on employment discrimination claims.  Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13, 183‑206.
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1995).  How well do lawyers predict their success?  Public Law, 19, 1‑4.
  • Goodman, J. (1993).  Evaluating psychological expertise on questions of social fact.  Law & Human Behavior, 17, 249‑255.
  • Goodman, J. (1993).  Trial wins are hard to predict.  National Law Journal, 15, 31‑34.
  • Goodman, J. (1992).  Jurors' comprehension and assessment of probabilistic evidence.  American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 16, 361‑389.
  • Schwartz, D. J., & Goodman, J. (1992).  Expert testimony on decision processes in employment cases.  Law & Human Behavior, 16, 337‑355.
  • Severance, L. J., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1992).  Inferring the criminal mind: Toward a bridge between legal doctrine and psychological understanding.  Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 15‑27.
  • Goodman, J., Loftus, E. F., Lee, M., & Greene, E. (1991).  Money, sex and death: Gender bias in wrongful death damage awards.  Law and Society Review 25, 263‑285.
  • Greene, E., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1991).  Jurors' attitudes about civil litigation and the size of damage awards.  American University Law Review, 40, 805‑820.
  • Raitz, A., Greene, E., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1990).  Determining damages: The influence of expert testimony on juror's decision-making. Law & Human Behavior, 14, 385‑395.
  • Goodman, J., Loftus, E. F., & Greene, E. (1990). Matters of money: Voir dire in civil cases.  Forensic Reports, 3, 303‑330.
  • Goodman, J., Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F.  (1989). Runaway verdicts or reasoned determinations: Mock‑juror strategies in awarding damages.  Jurimetrics, 29, 285‑309.
  • Goodman, J., & Croyle, R. C.  (1989). Social framework testimony in employment discrimination cases.  Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 7, 227‑ 241.
  • Goodman, J., & Greene, E.  (1989). Assessing jury comprehension by paraphrase analysis.  Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 237‑251.
  • Christianson, S. A., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F.  (1989). Eyewitness testimony.  In M. W. Eysenck, A. Ellis, E. Hunt, & P. Johnson‑Laird, (Eds.), The Blackwell dictionary of cognitive psychology.  Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell, Ltd.
  • Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1988).  Commentary: The relevance of expert testimony on eyewitness memory.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 115‑121.
  • Loftus, E. F., & Goodman, J. (1989).  Is the verdict in on the American jury?  Book review of S. Kassin & L. Wrightsman, "The American jury on trial: Psychological perspectives," Contemporary Psychology, 34,819‑820.
  • Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1987).  How to play to the jury you select in complex and other cases.  Criminal Justice, 2, 2‑5, 42‑43.
  • Goodman, J., & Nickerson, P. H. (1985).  Book review of J. Monahan & L. Walker, "Social science and the law: Cases and materials." Trial, 29, 85‑88.
  • Goodman, J., Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1985).  What confuses jurors in complex cases.  Trial, 21, 65‑74.
  • Goodman, J., & Greene, E. (1984).  Book review, A. Elwork, B. Sales & J. J. Alfini, "Making jury instructions understandable."  Florida Bar Journal, 11, 71O‑711; reprinted in the Seattle King‑County Bar Bulletin, 14.
  • Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (l984).  Social science looks at witness examination. Trial, 20, 52‑57.

Refereed conference proceedings:

  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & Martschuk, N. (2014). Persistent misconceptions about child sexual assault abuse: The impact of specialized educative information and deliberation on mock-jurors. In K.C. Haung (Ed.), Proceedings of the third international conference of empirical studies of judicial systems: Citizen participation around the world, 5-6 September 2014 Taipei, Taiwan. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014).  Interviews with high value detainees to secure cooperation and reliable disclosures.  In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electronic Recording of Interrogations: Interview Skill, Recording Technology and Psycho-Legal Issues.  July 19-20, 2014, Kyoto, Japan.  Kyoto, Japan: Ritsumeikan University Law School.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2011).  Judges, juries and truth in fact-finding: Empirical perspective from legal professionals, jurors and the community.  Proceedings of the Symposium on Finding the Interface between Lay and Judicial Judgments. Seoul, Korea: Judicial Research and Training Institute.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Dhami, M.K. (2011).  Forensic science evidence: Pitfalls and safeguards.  Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Understanding Forensic Science in Criminal Justice.  Seoul, Korea: Korean Institute of Criminology.
  • Devaraj, S, & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2007). Applying the Elaboration Likelihood Model: Assessing the credibility of Indigenous Australians in the legal system.   Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society (pp. 128-132).  Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
  • Betts, S., & Goodman-Delahunty, J.  (2007). Mothers who kill repeatedly: Is justice possible when mothers violate stereotypes of benevolence?  Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society (pp. 17-21).  Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Hewson, J. (2007).  Can multimedia facilitate jury understanding of DNA evidence?  Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society (pp. 164-168).  Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
  • O'Brien, K., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2007).  Victim credibility in sexual assault: The influence of expectancies about alcohol and sexual behaviour.  Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society (pp. 302-306).  Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
  • Pratley, J., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Tait, D. (2007).  Media perceptions of the jury: Myth or reality?  Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society (pp. 327-331).  Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Rabone, S. (2005).  Multimedia evidence and the jury:  Applying principles of effective communication.  Invited address at the 23d Annual Conference of the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2005).  Is perception reality?  Differing perceptions of psychological injuries in the workplace.  In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Pacific Labor & Employment Law Conference.  Seattle, WA: Pacific Labor and Employment Law Conference.
  • Sivasubramaniam, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2003). Perceptions of justice among minority cultures: Youth justice conferencing.  Proceedings of the Conference of the Australian Institute of Criminology/NSW Department of Juvenile Justice, Sydney, Australia. http://www.aic.gov.au/conferences/2003-juvenile/sivasubramaniam.html
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2001). Promoting consumer complaints in the financial sector. http://fido.asic.gov.au/fido/fido.nsf
  • Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1995).  Eliminating barriers to settlement through effective management of employment disputes.  Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services/Endispute, San Diego, CA.
  • Goodman, J., & Greene, E. (1991).  Facilitating jury understanding in employment cases.  In Employment litigation in the 1990s (App. 10, pp. 1‑110).  Larkspur, CA: National Employment Law Institute.
  • Goodman, J. (1990).  Use of experts and statistics.  In Employment law: Practical advice for representing plaintiffs (pp. 251‑287).  Seattle, WA: Washington State Trial Lawyers Association.
  • Andrews, N. B., & Goodman, J. (1987).  Negotiations tactics for women.  Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Women in Computing.  Chicago, Illinois.
  • Loftus, E. F., Goodman, J., & Nagatkin, C. (1983).  Examining witnesses: Good advice and bad.  In R. J. Matlon & R. J. Crawford (Eds.), Communication strategies in the practice of lawyering (pp. 292‑317).  Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Technical research reports:

  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Hale, S. B., Martschuk, N., & Dhami, M. K. (2015). Effects of situational and relational variables on interpreting in high stakes interviewing. Research report toUnited States High Value Detainee Interrogation Group and the Center for Law and Human Behavior. Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2014). Evidence-based sentencing of parental child sexual assault offenders. Submission to the Join Select Committee on Sentencing of Child Sexual Assault Offenders. Sydney, AU:New South Wales Parliament.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Dhami, M.K., & Martschuk, N. (2013).  Interviewing techniques to secure co-operation from high value detainees.  Research report toUnited States High Value Detainee Interrogation Group and the Center for Law and Human Behavior. Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Sivasubramaniam, D. (2013).  Investigative and intelligence interview practices in Asia-Pacific jurisdictions.  Research report toUnited States High Value Detainee Interrogation Group and the Centre for Law and Human Behavior. Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Thompson, A., McGrath, A. & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2013).  Validity of the Australian adaptation of the Youth Level of Service /Case Management Inventory and investigation of prediction errors for low and high risk juvenile offenders. Research report to Juvenile Justice, NSW Department of Attorney General and Justice, Sydney, New South Wales.  Bathurst, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Beckley, A., & Hanckel, B. (2012).  The NSW Police Force complaints process: Experiences of community advocates and legal practitioners.  Research report to Community Legal Centres New South Wales, Inc.  Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Beckley, A., & Hanckel, B. (2012).   Police accountability: Have your clients' right been violated by the NSW Police?  Report to Community Legal Centres New South Wales, Inc.  Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University. http://www.clcnsw.org.au/PoliceComplaints
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Sivasubramaniam, D. (2013).  Investigative and intelligence interviewing in Asia-Pacific jurisdictions.  Research report toUnited States High Value Detainee Interrogation Group and the Center for Law and Human Behavior.  Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J., Verbrugge, H., & Taitz, M. (2011).  New South Wales Police Force Customer Service Program Evaluation and Analysis.  Research report to the New South Wales Police Force.  Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Hanson, M., Richardson, A., Rossner, E., Tait, D., Wallace A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010). Gateways to justice: Improving evidence by videolink: Experimental findings. Technical report to the Australian Government Australian Research Council and the Justice Research Group. Sydney, AU: University of Western Sydney.
  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2009).  The NSW Pre-trial Diversion of Offenders (Child Sexual Assault) Program: An evaluation of treatment outcomes.  Research report to Sydney West Area Health Service.  Manly, AU: Charles Sturt University.
  • Kemp, R., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Bryant, R., Von Hippel, C., Paterson, H., & Walsh, A. (2003).  The inherent requirements of frontline policing.  Research report to New South Wales Police Force.Sydney:University of New South Wales Australia.
  • Malpass, R. S., & Goodman‑Delahunty, J. (1994).  Social and ethnic conflict: Implications of restricted intergroup experience for the legal process.  Research report to National Science Foundation Global Initiatives Sociolegal Studies Program, Washington, D.C.
  • Goodman, J. (1991). Lawyer overconfidence in dispute resolution: Executive summary and final report.  Research report to the National Institute for Dispute Resolution, Washington, D.C.
  • Goodman, J., Greene, E. & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Jury comprehension in complex cases. Research report to the American Bar Association Litigation Section Jury Comprehension Committee.
  • Greene, E., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Case study: EKA et al. v. Union Carbide, Inc. et al. Research report to the American Bar Association Litigation Section Jury Comprehension Committee.
  • Greene, E., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Case study: U.S. v. Gaitanis. Research report to the American Bar Association Litigation Section Jury Comprehension Committee.
  • Greene, E., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. (1987). Case Study: Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse v. Belk Brothers Co., Belk Stores Buying Services, Inc., & Jantzen, Inc. Research report to the American Bar Association Litigation Section Jury Comprehension Committee.
  • Goodman, J., Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Case study: Janie Lee Stewart v. Sonoma County. Research report to the American Bar Association Litigation Section Jury Comprehension Committee.

Top of page


Education

University of Washington, Doctor of Philosophy, Psychology and Law, 1986.  Dissertation:  Probabilistic scientific evidence: Jurors' inferences.

Seattle University School of Law, Juris Doctor, cum laude, 1983.

Witwatersrand University, Transvaal Teachers Higher Diploma, highest distinction, 1973. Research thesis: The relationship between thought and language.  

Witwatersrand University, Bachelor of Arts, English and French, 1972.

CURRENT APPOINTMENTS

Research Professor, Charles Sturt University, Faculty of Business, Justice and Behavioural Sciences, Manly Campus, Manly, Australia, 2009-present.    

General Member, New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Community Services Division, Sydney, Australia, 2007-2021.

General Member, New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Equal Opportunity Division, Sydney, Australia, 2010-2021.

 

ACADEMIC POSITIONS HELD

Associate Professor, Director of Forensic Psychology Postgraduate Research Program, Department of Psychology, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, 2001-2009.

Adjunct Professor of Law, Whittier Law School, Costa Mesa, California, 1988.

Research Assistant Professor, Research Associate Professor, University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Seattle, Washington, 1986-1992.

Adjunct Law Faculty, University of Seattle School of Law, Seattle, Washington, 1989-1990.

VISITING PROFESSOR APPOINTMENTS

China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China, 2014.

University of Surrey, Guildford, England, 2013.

Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan, 2012.

LAW REFORM AND LAW PRACTICE APPOINTMENTS

Law Reform:

Commissioner, New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Sydney, Australia, 2002-2013 (pt).

Consultant, American Bar Association Litigation Section, Chicago, Illinois, 1985-1989.

Adjudication:

Administrative Judge, US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Southern California Regional Office, Los Angeles, California, 1992‑2001.

Alternate Dispute Resolution:

Mediator, New South Wales Department of Commerce, Consumers and Tenants Fair Trading Mediation Services Unit, Sydney, Australia, 2007-2013.

Mediator, JAMS, Southern California, 1994‑2001.

Litigation:

Attorney at Law, Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP, Seattle, Washington, 1989‑1992.  

Trial Attorney, US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Northwest Regional Office, Seattle, Washington, 1984‑1988.     

Associate, Bricklin & Gendler, Seattle, Washington, 1983‑1984.   

Legal Associate, Disabilities Law Project, Tacoma, Washington, 1982-1983.

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND ACCREDITATION:

Member, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, No. 14292, Washington, 1983-present.

Admitted to practice, Attorney and Counselor at Law before the State of Washington Supreme Court, the State of Washington Court of Appeals, the United States District Court, Western District of Washington, pro hac vice admissions in Alaska, California, Idaho, Minneapolis, Nebraska, Oregon, and Texas.

Registered Psychologist, No. PS0095714, Australian Psychological Society, 2005. 

Accredited Mediator, The Resolution Institute-Leading Edge Alternative Dispute Resolvers, Sydney, Australia, 2002.

Certified Mediator, San Diego Dispute Resolution Centre, San Diego, California, 1994.

Certified Teacher, Washington, Seattle Department of Public Education, Washington, USA, 1976.

Certified Teacher, Transvaal Education Department, South Africa, 1973.

Top of page